Blog » Energy & Climate Change
Energy & Climate Change
Posted by James Harries, Senior technical consultant – climate change, energy and sustainable transport on 29 November 2012
Repeat after me – “MRV and NAMAs are not new
concepts”. Depending on how close you
are to the international climate negotiations, you may be
scratching your head over what
I’m talking about or rolling your eyes in familiarity.
First, let’s unpack the acronyms:
MRV is measurement, reporting and verification; and NAMAs
are nationally appropriate mitigation actions. Both concepts
are being discussed within the international climate
negotiations and if I had a pound/euro/dollar/peso for every
time I heard MRV and NAMAs being described as new
concepts…..
Posted by Christine St John Cox, Knowledge Leader Carbon Management on 16 October 2012
The countdown has begun for all quoted businesses listed on
the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange following the
government’s announcement in July that they will have to
report their levels of greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from
April next year.
Posted by Christine St John Cox, Knowledge Leader: Carbon Management on 22 June 2012
On Wednesday the UK Government announced the outcome of its
consultation on greenhouse gas
company reporting. They announced that from the start of the
next financial year, April 2013, all businesses
listed on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange will
have to report their levels of greenhouse gas emissions.
Posted by Gena Gibson, Consultant: Energy and Climate Change on 22 June 2012
Back in 2007 Larry Page, CEO and co-founder of Google,
declared that the company would get involved directly in
energy research, with the ambitious aim to wean the US off
fossil fuels. Moreover, Google believed they could make
renewable energy cheaper than coal. However, the internet
giant recently announced that it was abandoning this project
despite having invested $915 million in clean energy
projects to date. That is a lot of money, even for Google.
Posted by Robert Milnes, Consultant - Economics & Emissions Trading on 25 May 2012
The EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) has been widely
criticised for imposing an excessive administrative cost on
small emitters, and for the inclusion of hospitals. The move
into Phase III of the EU ETS, which will run from 2013 –
2020, provided Member States with an opportunity to remedy
the situation. Indeed, if they could come up with an
alternative mechanism to encourage small emitters and
hospitals to reduce emissions, the European Commission (EC)
would allow those organisations to drop out of the EU ETS
for Phase III.
Posted by Robert Milnes, Consultant - Economics & Emissions Trading on 17 May 2012
Climate policy increasingly involves putting a price on
environmental impacts. This can be done by creating a market
through politically influenced targets or by estimating the
monetary cost of the damage which companies cause to the
environment. A pioneering example is the EU Emissions
Trading System (EU ETS), which has created a market for
carbon, targeting the big emitters in Europe. In principle
it is quite simple, the European Commission supplies an
amount of carbon credits which politicians agree is
Europe’s share of what the global skies can tolerate, and
companies buy them up. The more companies emit, the more
demand there is for the credits and so the carbon price
rises. The idea is that as the carbon price rises, big
emitters start thinking about new technologies to reduce
emissions to avoid paying the carbon price. Sounds OK?
Posted by Christine St John Cox, Knowledge Leader: Carbon Management on 19 April 2012
Over the past year we have all watched the build-up to the
Government’s decision on mandatory company reporting of
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and its implications for
businesses. With the Climate Change Act requiring the
Government to introduce mandatory reporting for businesses
by 6 April 2012, or explain why they have not, we have been
waiting with bated breath for the outcome of the
consultation held last summer.
Posted by Mark Johnson, Knowledge Leader - Energy and Carbon Regulation on 28 March 2012
The Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) has
released its long awaited consultation on the simplification
of CRC Energy Efficiency Scheme (CRC). They have naturally
placed considerable emphasis on proposals for administrative
savings to address the biggest criticism of the scheme –
its complexity. But will these meet George Osborne’s
requirement for “very significant” savings that will
prevent the scheme being scrapped altogether?
Posted by Gena Gibson, Consultant: Energy and Climate Change on 1 March 2012
The signs of a bubble are that an asset is overpriced and
there is a widespread belief in its price. The dot.com boom
and housing are classic examples because they were both
overvalued at the time, but it was never questioned until
too late – it was unthinkable not to own a house, or not
to be investing in tech stocks.
Posted by Heather Haydock, Practice Director: Energy and Climate Change on 31 January 2012
*UK Energy minister Charles Hendry said in a **recent
address **to a Wilton Park Conference that natural gas is a
critical part of the UK energy mix today and will continue
to have a crucial role tomorrow, and beyond 2030. His
views are echoed by the International Energy Agency (IEA),
who recently published a special report entitled “**Are we
entering a golden age of gas?**”.*